The push for mandatory testing for COVID-19 has been extreme, even going so far as to mandate testing upon healthy persons. In reality, there is ZERO proof that current tests even detect a virus or even whether a legitimately deadly virus exists.
Following the 2003 SARS scare, nobody had proved that such a virus existed nor that it was pathogenic. When all was said and done, patients received extreme and ineffective treatments that resulted in “persistent neurologic deficit, joint replacements, scarring, pain, and liver disease.”
Today, the narrative is that there is, in fact, a brand new virus (novel coronavirus), and it is deadly. This is false. If there is a virus, viral particles should be purified from which to extract RNA which can match the test RNA. Until that is done, there is no proof of COVID-19 infection. Sure, there may be a correlation between RNA levels and illness, but without purifying the virus, one cannot prove scientifically that the RNA is from a specific virus.
Further, COVID-19 has zero of its own symptoms, instead “borrowing” respiratory issues such as cough and breathing difficulties, as well as fever, from other viruses and bacteria, as well as environmental contaminants.
The current test is based on PCR (polymerase chain reaction) that was invented by Kary Mullis who received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1993 for it. It is simply a manufacturing technique that was never designed to be a diagnostic tool.
There is no positive/negative result, just a random and arbitrary number of cycles necessary to detect genetic material. Thus, a person can test positive then negative then positive then negative depending on the number of cycles. And what are they testing positive/negative for, exactly? Certainly not the #hoaxvirus COVID-19.
Additionally, as far as transmission goes, it is impossible to prove that a person contacted COVID-19 from an infected person. It can, however, be surmised that someone was in the vicinity of someone else who tested positive at some point, but this doesn’t constitute proof of exposure.
If healthy people are tested (which the CDC originally said should NOT occur) and test positive (even if it is a false positive), they are likely to be treated with SARS-similar treatments, many of which may be wholly unnecessary and even dangerous. This leads to anticipatory treatment for anticipated symptoms, not for a current illness that cannot be conclusively diagnosed.
Any test for a pathogen should adhere to Koch’s postulates that state that:
- purify the pathogen
- expose susceptible animals to the pathogen
- verify that the same illness is produced
- re-purify the pathogen to ensure that is, in fact, creating the illness
NONE of this has been done for COVID-19, yet people are standing in line willing to be tested and employers are unconstitutionally mandating healthy employees be tested for fear of losing their jobs.
Also troubling is the extremely high false-positive rate that can have serious, long-term implications for the person being tested. The stigma of a false positive can be far-reaching leading to depression, unnecessary treatment, and having to tell the government all of their contacts so these contacts can be unconstitutionally tracked.
In sum, the COVID-19 panic is “an irrational panic, based on an unproven RNA test, that has never been connected to a virus [and won’t be] unless the virus is purified.”
You can (and should) read the entire referenced article here.